D. AYYAVU (D) BY LRS. vs THOLLA RAJAGOPAL CHETTIAR TRUST BY ITS TRUSTEES — C.A. No. 5135/2008

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010155302006

Filing Date

30-Jun-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 5135/2008

Diary Number

15530/2006

Order Date

19-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Transferred to High Court

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D. AYYAVU (D) BY LRS.

    Adv. K. K. MANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THOLLA RAJAGOPAL CHETTIAR TRUST BY ITS TRUSTEES

    Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 19-Jul-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  4. 16-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 17-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 15-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 31-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 23-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 09-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 31-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 14-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 08-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 31-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 30-Jun-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5135/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: D. Ayyavu (D) by LRS v. Tholla Rajagopal Chettiar Trust The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment dated 29.03.2006, which had decreed the respondent's suit for recovery of property possession, balance rent, and agricultural profits. The High Court had reversed the trial and appellate courts' dismissals based solely on the Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection (Amendment) Act, 1994, without examining the appellants' substantive rights. The Supreme Court found this summary decree improper and remanded the matter to the High Court for reconsideration on merits in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case