BOMBAY MILK PRODUCERS ASSN. vs JANHIT MANCH . — SLP(C) No. 18405/2010
Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010155252010
Filing Date
11-May-2010
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 18405/2010
Diary Number
15525/2010
Order Date
10-Dec-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BOMBAY MILK PRODUCERS ASSN.
Adv. SHIV KUMAR SURI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.JANHIT MANCH .
Adv. S. C. BIRLA ABHA R. SHARMA YASH PAL DHINGRA SHIVAJI M. JADHAV J. P. DHANDA MEERA MATHUR ASHA GOPALAN NAIR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 18405/2010
Summary: SLP(C) No. 018405/2010 - Bombay Milk Producers Assn. v. Janhit Manch Hearing Date: 10/12/2012 Outcome: The Supreme Court (Justice D.K. Jain and Justice Madan B. Lokur) condoned the delay in filing and disposed of the special leave petition. Rather than deciding the substantive issues, the Court remitted the matter back to the High Court of Bombay, finding that the High Court would be better positioned to appreciate the ground realities and address the issues raised. Directions: The Supreme Court requested the High Court to expeditiously take up the original W.P. (C) No. 2565 of 2005 and pass appropriate orders/directions as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts