NIMAY SAH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND — Crl.A. No. 211/2011
Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010152872010
Filing Date
10-May-2010
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 211/2011
Diary Number
15287/2010
Order Date
02-Dec-2020
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2020 INSC 670
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIMAY SAH
Adv. APARNA JHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Adv. KRISHNANAND PANDEYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Dec-2020
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2020
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
11-Aug-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 211/2011
-
[ 2020 INSC 670 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: Nimay Sah v. State of Jharkhand Decision: The Supreme Court acquitted appellant Nimay Sah, the deceased's brother-in-law, of dowry harassment charges under Section 498-A IPC, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While witnesses testified generally about harassment at the matrimonial home, they failed to specifically name Nimay Sah or provide concrete instances of dowry demands against him. Notably, the deceased's own letters to her brother made no mention of harassment, and most independent witnesses turned hostile. The court concluded the evidence was too vague and insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts