RAMESH CHAND (D) THR.LRS. vs SURESH CHAND — C.A. No. 6377/2012
Case under Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Matters Arising Out of Suit for Specific Performance, Declaration, Injunction, Possession or Cancellation of Deeds/documents Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010152522012
Filing Date
01-May-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 6377/2012
Diary Number
15252/2012
Order Date
01-Sep-2025
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2025 INSC 1059
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMESH CHAND (D) THR.LRS.
Adv. S. MAHENDRAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURESH CHAND
Adv. REKHA PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Sep-2025
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar
-
31-Jul-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6377/2012
-
[ 2025 INSC 1059 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: Ramesh Chand (D) THR.LRS. v. Suresh Chand Court Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and dismissed the plaintiff's suit for possession and title. Key Reasoning: The Court held that an agreement to sell, general power of attorney, receipt, and registered will—without an actual registered sale deed—do not confer valid title to immovable property under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The will was found not properly proved as required by law (attesting witnesses not examined), and the plaintiff lacked possession to claim benefits under Section 53A. Since the father's succession opened upon his death, legal heirs are entitled to the property, not the plaintiff based on disputed documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts