RAMESH CHAND (D) THR.LRS. vs SURESH CHAND — C.A. No. 6377/2012

Case under Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Matters Arising Out of Suit for Specific Performance, Declaration, Injunction, Possession or Cancellation of Deeds/documents Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010152522012

Filing Date

01-May-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 6377/2012

Diary Number

15252/2012

Order Date

01-Sep-2025

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2025 INSC 1059

Disposal Type

Appeals Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – matters arising out of suit for specific performance, declaration, injunction, possession or cancellation of deeds/documents Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH CHAND (D) THR.LRS.

    Adv. S. MAHENDRAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESH CHAND

    Adv. REKHA PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Sep-2025

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Sep-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 01-Sep-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  5. 31-Jul-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 31-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Aug-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 26-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 26-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 08-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 11-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 05-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 01-May-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6377/2012

  16. [ 2025 INSC 1059 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ramesh Chand (D) THR.LRS. v. Suresh Chand Court Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and dismissed the plaintiff's suit for possession and title. Key Reasoning: The Court held that an agreement to sell, general power of attorney, receipt, and registered will—without an actual registered sale deed—do not confer valid title to immovable property under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The will was found not properly proved as required by law (attesting witnesses not examined), and the plaintiff lacked possession to claim benefits under Section 53A. Since the father's succession opened upon his death, legal heirs are entitled to the property, not the plaintiff based on disputed documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case