AKSHAY KUMAR @ AKASH KUMAR @ SURAJ vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — Crl.A. No. 2313/2026

Case under 1511Rb-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(slps Arising Out of Regular Bail Applications, Suspension of Sentence.) Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010151792026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2313/2026

Diary Number

15179/2026

Order Date

04-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1511RB-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(SLPs arising out of Regular Bail applications, suspension of sentence.) Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKSHAY KUMAR @ AKASH KUMAR @ SURAJ

    Adv. SUBHRO SANYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

    Adv. PREM PRAKASH[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2313/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 002313/2026 – Akshay Kumar v. State of Bihar The Supreme Court allowed Akshay Kumar's bail appeal on May 4, 2026, reversing the Patna High Court's rejection dated February 10, 2026. Accused of offences under BNS 2023 (firearm-related charges) and the Arms Act, arrested February 10, 2025, Kumar was the only one of thirteen co-accused remaining in custody. The court found continued detention unnecessary since trial would span considerable time with only 1 of 7 prosecution witnesses examined, witness intimidation risk was minimal (only 1 non-public witness), and parity existed with released co-accused. Kumar was granted bail upon furnishing bonds to trial court satisfaction, with strict conditions: no witness tampering, mandatory trial attendance, and liberty for trial court to cancel bail upon breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case