DINESH KUMAR vs DELHI PINJRA POLE SOCIETY,DELHI . — SLP(C) No. 21922/2010

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010150342010

Filing Date

07-May-2010

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 21922/2010

Diary Number

15034/2010

Order Date

01-May-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESH KUMAR

    Adv. DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DELHI PINJRA POLE SOCIETY,DELHI .

    Adv. GAGAN GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 05-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 31-Aug-2012

    ROPView PDF

  5. 17-Jul-2012

    ROPView PDF

  6. 01-May-2012

    ROPView PDF

  7. 27-Mar-2012

    ROPView PDF

  8. 27-Mar-2012

    ROPView PDF

  9. 10-Feb-2012

    ROPView PDF

  10. 14-Dec-2011

    ROPView PDF

  11. 04-May-2011

    ROPView PDF

  12. 18-Apr-2011

    ROPView PDF

  13. 05-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Feb-2011

    ROPView PDF

  15. 10-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 25-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 11-Nov-2010

    ROPView PDF

  18. 08-Oct-2010

    ROPView PDF

  19. 30-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 10-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 30-Jul-2010

    ROPView PDF

  22. 11-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 07-May-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 21922/2010

  24. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 15-Apr-2010

    ROPView PDF

  26. 12-Mar-2010

    ROPView PDF

  27. 15-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 15-Feb-2010

    ROPView PDF

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 21922/2010 - Dinesh Kumar v. Delhi Pinjra Pole Society The Supreme Court heard consolidated petitions challenging a High Court judgment dated October 30, 2009, regarding land possession. On May 1, 2013, the Court rejected all special leave petitions, upholding the lower court's decision. However, petitioners were granted time until January 31, 2014, to vacate the disputed land, conditional on filing an undertaking that they would not create any third-party rights within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case