JAGDAMBA MAHILA READYMADE DRESSES VIVIDH ITPADAN SAHAKARI SANSTHA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — SLP(C) No.(Verified On 16-3-2026)
Case under Tenders/licenses/leases : Tenders/licenses/leases Invited by the State Governments/ Local Bodies/ State Public Sector Undertakings,including Cancellation/award of Tenders. Section IX. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010149422026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
SLP(C) No.(Verified On 16-3-2026)
Diary Number
14942/2026
Order Date
21-May-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGDAMBA MAHILA READYMADE DRESSES VIVIDH ITPADAN SAHAKARI SANSTHA
Adv. SURBHI KAPOOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE [caveat] T. HARISH KUMAR[R-5]
Case History
-
21-May-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-May-2026
Mention Memo
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta
-
14-May-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2026
Mention Memo
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta
-
06-May-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Mention Memo
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta
-
24-Mar-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Mention Memo
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe
-
24-Mar-2026
Mention Memo
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe
-
19-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No.(Verified On 16-3-2026)
Case Summary On 21-05-2026, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) No. 14942/2026 involving Jagdamba Mahila Readymade Dresses (petitioner) against the State of Maharashtra (respondent), relating to a tender dispute for uniform supplies to Ashram Schools. The Court passed interim directions: placing the 02-04-2026 work order in abeyance, directing the State to accept product supplies from the petitioner under the earlier 14-10-2024 work order temporarily, and permitting the State to place fresh orders per revised rate fixation policies. The respondent was granted four weeks to file a counter affidavit, with the matter listed for hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts