AMRIK SINGH vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — SLP(Crl) No. 4169 - 4171/2012
Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010147832012
Filing Date
27-Apr-2012
Registration No
SLP(Crl) No. 4169 - 4171/2012
Diary Number
14783/2012
Order Date
10-Oct-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMRIK SINGH
Adv. KAMINI JAISWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Adv. AJAY KUMAR SINGH MRS. VIPIN GUPTA KULDIP SINGH KULDIP SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Oct-2017
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit
-
12-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2012
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 4169 - 4171/2012
Summary: On 10-10-2017, the Supreme Court heard three consolidated Special Leave Petitions filed by Amrik Singh challenging High Court orders dated 31-01-2012 in criminal revision cases. After hearing counsel for both parties, the Court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned High Court orders and dismissed all three petitions. Any pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts