<font color='red'>SMT. SUMITRA</font> vs SHAKUNTALA DEVI (DEAD) THR. LRS. — C.A. No. 2771/2011
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010146122010
Filing Date
05-May-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 2771/2011
Diary Number
14612/2010
Order Date
29-Sep-2021
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SUMITRA
Adv. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-2] MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-3] MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-4] MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-5] MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-6] MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-7]
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAKUNTALA DEVI (DEAD) THR. LRS.
Adv. VIKAS MEHTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Sep-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
28-Sep-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
21-Sep-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Sep-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
06-Jan-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2021
IA
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
05-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
26-Apr-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2771/2011
Summary of Civil Appeal No. 2771/2011 The Supreme Court dismissed the defendants' appeal challenging the High Court's decree awarding possession of disputed property in Paonta Sahib to the plaintiffs/respondents. The plaintiffs had proven valid title via registered sale deed dated 19.05.1927 from Laxmi Chand to their predecessor Duni Chand. The Court held that defendants failed to establish adverse possession—a prerequisite to defeat a title-based possession suit under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963—and did not prove the property was joint Hindu family property as claimed. As legal owners, plaintiffs are entitled to possession regardless of defendants' physical occupancy duration, unless adverse possession is proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts