ROHIT KUMAR vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — SLP(Crl) No. 1842/2013

Case under Section COMPUTER CELL. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010145732011

Filing Date

28-Mar-2011

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 1842/2013

Diary Number

14573/2011

Order Date

26-Nov-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section COMPUTER CELL

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT KUMAR

    Adv. JAIL PETITION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Nov-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 26-Nov-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  4. 19-Nov-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 19-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 23-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 23-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 31-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 27-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 25-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 16-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 28-Mar-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 1842/2013

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(Crl) No. 1842/2013 – Rohit Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition on 26-11-2018, finding no reason to interfere with the High Court's 2010 order. However, the Court noted that Rohit Kumar had already served 14 years in prison without the State considering premature release. Directions: The petitioner is directed to file a representation to the Secretary (Home), Government of Chhattisgarh seeking remission under applicable State rules. The State is directed to consider and decide the representation within two months. If the State fails to consider or rejects the representation, the petitioner may apply for restoration of the special leave petition before the Supreme Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case