HOUSING COMMR.U P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISH vs VIKRAM KAPOOR . — SLP(C) No. 35289 - 35290/2011
Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010145522011
Filing Date
02-May-2011
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 35289 - 35290/2011
Diary Number
14552/2011
Order Date
02-Jul-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HOUSING COMMR.U P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISH
Adv. VISHNU SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIKRAM KAPOOR .
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
17-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
02-May-2011
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 35289 - 35290/2011
-
13-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
10-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
06-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
11-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
15-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
18-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
03-Nov-2009
ROPView PDF
-
05-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2008
ROPView PDF
-
10-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
14-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
14-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
03-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Apr-2006
ROPView PDF
-
30-Sep-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Dec-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: SLP(C) No. 035289-035290/2011 On 2 July 2012, the Supreme Court heard the special leave petitions filed by Housing Commissioner U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Vikram Kapoor and others. The Court found that the controversy was covered by the precedent in *Sardar Jogendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh* (2008 (17) SCC 133) and dismissed all petitions accordingly. All pending applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts