WILFRED ROZARIO FERNANDES vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 880/2012
Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010145002011
Filing Date
02-May-2011
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 880/2012
Diary Number
14500/2011
Order Date
23-Aug-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.WILFRED ROZARIO FERNANDES
Adv. VIRESH B. SAHARYA[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Adv. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Aug-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta
-
03-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2011
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 880/2012
Summary of Crl.A. No. 880/2012 (Wilfred Rozario Fernandes v. State of Maharashtra) The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal challenging his conviction for murder (IPC Section 302) by the trial court and the High Court's confirmation thereof. Fernandes was convicted of murdering Sachin Harisingh Bogati on October 5, 1997, based on circumstantial evidence including: being last seen with the victim, financial disputes and motive, absconding and surrendering days later, recovery of blood-stained clothing matching the victim's blood group, and failure to explain incriminating circumstances. The Court found concurrent findings by both lower courts and held the circumstantial evidence chain established guilt. Fernandes, sentenced to life imprisonment plus Rs. 1,000 fine, was directed to surrender before the trial court by September 13, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts