MOHAMMED JAMAL vs MOHMMAD HABEEBUDIN . — SLP(C) No. 2795/2007

Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010144262006

Filing Date

08-Jun-2006

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 2795/2007

Diary Number

14426/2006

Order Date

06-Aug-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED JAMAL

    Adv. R. V. KAMESHWARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHMMAD HABEEBUDIN .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 27-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 04-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 12-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 22-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 19-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 01-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 06-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 13-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 26-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 06-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 08-Jun-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 2795/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 002795/2007 On 06/08/2012, the Supreme Court dismissed Mohammed Jamal's Special Leave Petition against Mohmmad Habeebudin and others. The Court noted that the petition had already been dismissed against respondents 1, 3, 4, and 6-8 on 04/01/2012, but the petitioner's counsel remained unaware of this dismissal and continued seeking adjournments. Given this lack of diligence and repeated adjournments, the Court dismissed the entire petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case