RAJENDRA @ RAJAPPA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE OF KARNATAKA SECRETARY GENERAL — Crl.A. No. 1438/2011
Case under Section COMPUTER CELL. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010144102011
Filing Date
02-May-2011
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1438/2011
Diary Number
14410/2011
Order Date
26-Mar-2021
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2021 INSC 219
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJENDRA @ RAJAPPA
Adv. MRS. VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE OF KARNATAKA SECRETARY GENERAL
Adv. ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2021
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
17-Mar-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
16-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
10-Mar-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
09-Mar-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
04-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
03-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta
-
02-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta
-
25-Feb-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
24-Feb-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
23-Feb-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
16-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
11-Feb-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
11-Feb-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
11-Feb-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
10-Feb-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
09-Feb-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
04-Jan-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2011
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1438/2011
Summary: Crl.A. No. 001438 / 2011 (Rajendra @ Rajappa v. State of Karnataka) The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' criminal appeal challenging their murder conviction. The trial court had acquitted all accused, but Karnataka's High Court reversed this on appeal, convicting accused nos. 2-5 under IPC Sections 302/149 (murder) and related sections, sentencing them to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction, finding the trial court's acquittal perverse and contrary to evidence. The Court credited eyewitness testimonies (wife, brother, and mother-in-law of deceased) as natural and trustworthy despite minor discrepancies, rejecting the trial court's dismissal based on witness-relationships. Medical evidence corroborated the incident timing. The Court affirmed the conviction, holding the assault was intentional with shared common object among accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts