MANAK CHAND vs STATE OF HARYANA . — C.A. No. 9803/2003
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010144012001
Filing Date
23-Aug-2001
Registration No
C.A. No. 9803/2003
Diary Number
14401/2001
Order Date
27-Oct-2004
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 25-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANAK CHAND
Adv. HINGORANI & ASSOCIATES (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. KAVEETA WADIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Oct-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jul-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Dec-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2003
ROPView PDF
-
14-Apr-2003
ROPView PDF
-
07-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jan-2003
ROPView PDF
-
20-Dec-2002
ROPView PDF
-
15-Nov-2002
ROPView PDF
-
04-Oct-2002
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2002
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
19-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
05-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2002
ROPView PDF
-
22-Jul-2002
ROPView PDF
-
29-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2002
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2002
ROPView PDF
-
21-Jan-2002
ROPView PDF
-
07-Dec-2001
ROPView PDF
-
29-Oct-2001
ROPView PDF
-
08-Oct-2001
ROPView PDF
-
08-Oct-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2001
ROPView PDF
-
14-Sep-2001
ROPView PDF
-
14-Sep-2001
ROPView PDF
-
31-Aug-2001
ROPView PDF
-
31-Aug-2001
ROPView PDF
-
27-Aug-2001
ROPView PDF
-
23-Aug-2001
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 9803/2003
-
13-Aug-2001
ROPView PDF
-
01-Jan-1970
ROPView PDF
The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of land claimants in a batch of 69 connected cases involving land acquisition of 486.61 acres in Faridabad, Haryana. The court remitted the matter to the reference court for fresh reassessment of compensation in light of the Constitution Bench's clarification on admissibility of certified sale deeds under Section 51A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, while maintaining the minimum market value of Rs.90/- per square yard that the State had accepted. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts