RAJ KUMAR GANDHI vs CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION — C.A. No. 4265 - 4266/2008
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010143412008
Filing Date
13-May-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 4265 - 4266/2008
Diary Number
14341/2008
Order Date
11-May-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2018 INSC 493
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJ KUMAR GANDHI
Adv. DELHI LAW CHAMBERS[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION
Adv. SHUBHAM BHALLA[R-2] KIRAN BHARDWAJ[R-3]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2018
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit
-
24-Apr-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit
-
19-Apr-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit
-
18-Apr-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit
-
11-Apr-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit
-
04-Apr-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
25-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
10-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
31-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
25-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
07-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
15-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
13-May-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4265 - 4266/2008
-
[ 2018 INSC 493 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary: On 11-05-2018, the Supreme Court (Bench of Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Uday Umesh Lalit) heard Civil Appeals 4265-4266/2008 filed by Raj Kumar Gandhi against Chandigarh Administration. The Court dismissed all the appeals in terms of the signed judgment. No further hearing dates or directions were mentioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts