SANDEEP JAIKISHAN DHIR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — Crl.A. No. 2729/2026

Case under 1501Ab-criminal Law : Offences Against Women, Including Sexual Offences, Harassment, Domestic Violence, Dowry, Trafficking Etc.(slps Arising Out of Anticipatory Bail Applications.) Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010143372026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2729/2026

Diary Number

14337/2026

Order Date

06-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1501AB-Criminal Law : Offences against women, including sexual offences, harassment, domestic violence, dowry, trafficking etc.(SLPs arising out of Anticipatory Bail applications.) Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP JAIKISHAN DHIR

    Adv. SAURABH RAJPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

    Adv. ASHISH PANDEY [caveat] SIDDHANT SHARMA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 13-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2729/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sandeep Jaikishan Dhir v. State of Punjab Outcome: The Supreme Court granted leave and allowed the joint application, dissolving the marriage between appellant Sandeep Jaikishan Dhir and respondent no. 2 by mutual consent decree of divorce. All three pending FIRs/criminal cases between the parties (including charges under IPC §498A, §406, IT Act §66C, and BNS §72(1), §74, §79) were ordered closed. The appellant paid Rs. 7 lakh as settlement consideration. Directions: The court directed the registry to forward copies to all concerned courts for formal closure of cases and made the settlement agreement dated 13.04.2026 binding on both parties, warning them of contempt proceedings for breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case