SAHARA HOUSE vs U.O.I. — W.P.(C) No. 535/1998

Case under Section PIL-W. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010139911998

Filing Date

04-Sep-1998

Registration No

W.P.(C) No. 535/1998

Diary Number

13991/1998

Order Date

02-Dec-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section PIL-W

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHARA HOUSE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.O.I.

    Adv. C. K. SUCHARITA B. BALAJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ABHINAV MUKERJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) LIZ MATHEW (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ANUVRAT SHARMA T. V. GEORGE T. HARISH KUMAR P. V. YOGESWARAN RANJAN MUKHERJEE DEVENDRA SINGH MEHRA SHREEKANT NEELAPPA TERDAL SUSHMA SURI SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA NARESH K. SHARMA G. PRAKASH ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 11-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 04-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 19-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 03-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 09-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 05-Aug-2011

    ROPView PDF

  13. 15-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 10-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 26-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 12-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 10-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 30-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 17-Feb-2010

    ROPView PDF

  22. 16-Dec-2009

    ROPView PDF

  23. 07-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 23-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 29-Sep-2008

    ROPView PDF

  26. 05-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 08-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 12-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 27-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 01-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 08-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 28-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 20-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 05-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 08-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 28-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 31-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 07-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 02-Sep-2005

    ROPView PDF

  40. 23-Nov-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 18-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 19-Feb-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 29-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 18-Dec-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 06-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 04-Aug-2003

    ROPView PDF

  47. 02-May-2003

    ROPView PDF

  48. 14-Feb-2003

    ROPView PDF

  49. 18-Sep-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 02-Sep-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 05-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 22-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 18-Mar-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 14-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 19-Nov-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 24-Sep-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  57. 04-Sep-1998

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 535/1998

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Sahara House v. U.O.I., W.P.(C) No. 535/1998 On December 2, 2013, the Supreme Court disposed of this long-pending public interest litigation concerning HIV/AIDS treatment protocols. The Court found most issues resolved through monitoring and respondent compliance since 1998. Petitioners agreed to file separate representations to NACO within one month on four remaining matters: HIV2 diagnosis guidelines (finalized), routine viral load testing for ART patients (disagreement with NACO), ART drug stock availability (improved), and third-line treatment introduction status. The Court directed that if representations are filed, NACO shall consider them and pass appropriate orders accordingly, effectively concluding the litigation with grievance resolution mechanisms remaining available to petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case