SAVARALA SAI SREE vs GURRAMKONDA VASUDEVARAO — Crl.A. No. 5/2014
Case under Section II. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010139502011
Filing Date
27-Apr-2011
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 5/2014
Diary Number
13950/2011
Order Date
02-Jan-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAVARALA SAI SREE
Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY
Respondent(s)
-
1.GURRAMKONDA VASUDEVARAO
Adv. D. MAHESH BABU M. A. CHINNASAMY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2011
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 5/2014
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 5 of 2014 Savarala Sai Sree v. Gurramkonda Vasudevarao & Ors. The Supreme Court allowed the complainant's appeal, finding the sentences for dowry offences grossly inadequate. The respondents were originally convicted under Section 498-A IPC and Sections 3-4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act; the trial court imposed only 3 months imprisonment. The High Court further reduced this to 4 days. The Supreme Court held this violated Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, which mandates minimum 5 years imprisonment and ₹15,000 fine (or dowry value, whichever is more), and courts cannot impose lesser sentences without recording "exceptional reasons." The Court remanded the matter to the High Court with directions to determine appropriate punishment within 3 months after respondents file their reply within 8 weeks, emphasizing that sentences must be proportionate to offence severity and serve deterrent purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts