SAVARALA SAI SREE vs GURRAMKONDA VASUDEVARAO — Crl.A. No. 5/2014

Case under Section II. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010139502011

Filing Date

27-Apr-2011

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 5/2014

Diary Number

13950/2011

Order Date

02-Jan-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAVARALA SAI SREE

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURRAMKONDA VASUDEVARAO

    Adv. D. MAHESH BABU M. A. CHINNASAMY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 14-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 04-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 21-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 24-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 20-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 25-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 11-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Apr-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 5/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 5 of 2014 Savarala Sai Sree v. Gurramkonda Vasudevarao & Ors. The Supreme Court allowed the complainant's appeal, finding the sentences for dowry offences grossly inadequate. The respondents were originally convicted under Section 498-A IPC and Sections 3-4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act; the trial court imposed only 3 months imprisonment. The High Court further reduced this to 4 days. The Supreme Court held this violated Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, which mandates minimum 5 years imprisonment and ₹15,000 fine (or dowry value, whichever is more), and courts cannot impose lesser sentences without recording "exceptional reasons." The Court remanded the matter to the High Court with directions to determine appropriate punishment within 3 months after respondents file their reply within 8 weeks, emphasizing that sentences must be proportionate to offence severity and serve deterrent purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case