FAIZUR RAHMAN SAYEED vs ZAHIDA JABEEN AND ANR. — C.A. No. 1441/2008

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010138832007

Filing Date

08-May-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 1441/2008

Diary Number

13883/2007

Order Date

22-Nov-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAIZUR RAHMAN SAYEED

    Adv. KAUSHIK PODDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZAHIDA JABEEN AND ANR.

    Adv. S. THANANJAYAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-Nov-2017

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  4. 21-Nov-2017

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  5. 09-Oct-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Oct-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Apr-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 01-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 18-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 18-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 04-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 21-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 07-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 22-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 26-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 18-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 08-May-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1441/2008

casestatus.in Summary

In Civil Appeal No. 1441/2008, appellant Faizur Rahman Sayeed's counsel submitted on 22 November 2017 that he had instructions not to press the appeal. The Supreme Court bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and R. Banumathi accordingly dismissed the appeal as not pressed. No further proceedings were scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case