LILLY JOSE (D) THR. LRS. vs MOMY ABRAHAM — C.A. No. 190/2014

Case under Family Laws : Succession, Inheritance, Devolution of Property, Gift, Partition Amongst Family Members Section XI-B. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010137482012

Filing Date

19-Apr-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 190/2014

Diary Number

13748/2012

Order Date

15-Oct-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Laws : Succession, Inheritance, devolution of property, gift, partition amongst family members Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LILLY JOSE (D) THR. LRS.

    Adv. K.PARAMESHWAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] A. KARTHIK[P-1.2] A. KARTHIK[P-1.3] A. KARTHIK[P-1.4] A. KARTHIK[P-1.5]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOMY ABRAHAM

    Adv. SAJITH. P (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1]

Case History

  1. 15-Oct-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 15-Oct-2025

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  3. 24-Apr-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 24-Apr-2025

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  5. 28-Feb-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 28-Feb-2025

    Ordinary

    Registrar

  7. 31-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 31-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 27-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 06-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 28-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 02-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 28-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 21-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 04-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 19-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 190/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 190/2014 In this hearing dated 15-10-2025 before Justice R. Mahadevan, the Supreme Court heard three interlocutory applications: for abatement, condonation of delay in filing the application for setting aside abatement, and substitution. The Court directed that fresh notice be issued in all three applications, with a returnable date of four weeks. No substantive order on the merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case