MEINHARDT SINGAPORE PTE. LTD vs BHOPAL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (BMC) — SLP(C) No. 13668/2026
Case under Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to Arbitral Award, Matters Relating to Execution Under Section 36, Under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and Challenges to Arbitral Award Under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010135832026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 13668/2026
Diary Number
13583/2026
Order Date
16-Apr-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending Ias)
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MEINHARDT SINGAPORE PTE. LTD
Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHOPAL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (BMC)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 13668/2026
The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing and disposed of Meinhardt Singapore's Special Leave Petition with liberty to file a fresh application before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh for sympathetic consideration. The petitioner seeks expedited hearing of its arbitration appeal under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, which involves Rs. 12,60,26,768 awarded by an arbitrator, partly modified by the Commercial Court. The Court requested the High Court to hear the appeal within a reasonable period given the statutory six-month time limit under the Commercial Courts Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts