THE STATE OF PUNJAB NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD vs SUSHIL KUMAR VIG — C.A. No. 9296/2013

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010135272012

Filing Date

18-Apr-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 9296/2013

Diary Number

13527/2012

Order Date

29-Nov-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD

    Adv. KAUSHIK PODDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHIL KUMAR VIG

    Adv. AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-1] AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-2] AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Nov-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 29-Nov-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  4. 12-Oct-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Oct-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  6. 24-Aug-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  7. 17-Aug-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 17-Aug-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  9. 16-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 08-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 17-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9296/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 009296/2013 Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of New India Assurance Company's appeal on November 29, 2023, declining to interfere with the High Court's order that quashed the insurance company's decision to recover non-core benefits from retired development officers. The Court upheld that the Amendment Scheme 2003, under which the employees took voluntary retirement, governs the payment of non-core benefits and its ratio would prevail. Background: Development officers who opted for voluntary retirement under the Special Voluntary Retirement Package (SVRP) 2003 were later denied non-core benefits retroactively from April 2003, with the company seeking recovery from their retiral benefits. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana had quashed this recovery order, which the company appealed to the Supreme Court in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case