MAJ ABHIK CHAUDHURY vs UNION OF INDIA — SLP(C) No. 9068/2026

Case under Armed Forces and Paramilitary Forces : Slps and Writ Petitions Pertaining to Armed Forces and Paramilitary Forces, Including Recruitment/ Appointment, Court Martial, Disciplinary Action, Pension, Emoluments, Salary and Other Incidental Matters Section XIV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010135212026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 9068/2026

Diary Number

13521/2026

Order Date

19-Mar-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Armed Forces and ParaMilitary Forces : SLPs and Writ Petitions pertaining to armed forces and paramilitary forces, including recruitment/ appointment, court martial, disciplinary action, pension, emoluments, salary and other incidental matters Section XIV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAJ ABHIK CHAUDHURY

    Adv. MANJU JETLEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

    Adv. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1] MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-2] MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-3] MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-4]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 9068/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court dismissed Maj Abhik Chaudhury's Special Leave Petition challenging the Delhi High Court's judgment dated 26-02-2026, finding no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. All pending applications have been disposed of, concluding the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case