MONNET ISPAT vs UNION OF INDIA .MINISTRY OF POWER SECRETARY — C.A. No. 18506 - 18507/2017

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010135102013

Filing Date

25-Apr-2013

Registration No

C.A. No. 18506 - 18507/2017

Diary Number

13510/2013

Order Date

13-Nov-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Dismissed

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MONNET ISPAT

    Adv. E. C. AGRAWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA .MINISTRY OF POWER SECRETARY

    Adv. SUSHMA SURI C. K. RAI E. C. AGRAWALA MCLM & CO. (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Nov-2017

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  4. 07-Dec-2015
  5. 07-Dec-2015
  6. 18-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 14-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 14-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 24-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 15-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 31-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 31-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Apr-2014
  16. 25-Apr-2014
  17. 25-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 29-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 28-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 03-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 05-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 09-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 25-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 18506 - 18507/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. v. Union of India Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed Monnet Ispat's appeals, upholding the validity of Rule 3(1)(a)(ii) of the Electricity Rules, 2005, which requires captive power plants to consume at least 51% of generated electricity annually for their own use. Key Issue: Monnet Ispat challenged the rule as ultra vires (beyond authority) after regulators determined its 90 MW plant lost captive status when consumption fell below 51%. The Court rejected arguments that force majeure events should exempt the rule and found the 51% annual consumption requirement neither arbitrary nor an unlawful delegation of legislative power. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case