LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER vs CHAKALI GANGAMMA (D) BY LRS. . — C.A. No. 427 - 428/2004
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010135042000
Filing Date
12-Aug-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 427 - 428/2004
Diary Number
13504/2000
Order Date
09-May-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Adv. G. N. REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHAKALI GANGAMMA (D) BY LRS. .
Adv. SUJATA KURDUKAR C. K. SUCHARITA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2007
ROPView PDF
-
01-Nov-2007
ROPView PDF
-
28-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
26-Sep-2006
ROPView PDF
-
20-Sep-2006
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2005
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jan-2005
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2003
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jul-2003
ROPView PDF
-
31-Mar-2003
ROPView PDF
-
07-Jan-2003
ROPView PDF
-
30-Sep-2002
ROPView PDF
-
11-Jul-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2002
ROPView PDF
-
10-Dec-2001
ROPView PDF
-
29-Nov-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2001
ROPView PDF
-
24-Nov-2000
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 427 - 428/2004
-
01-Jan-1970
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary On May 9, 2013, the Supreme Court heard interlocutory applications for restoration of Civil Appeals Nos. 427-428 of 2004 and related appeals between the Land Acquisition Officer and Chakali Gangamma's successors. The Court condoned the delay in filing restoration applications and allowed restoration of the appeals to their original numbers, subject to the appellants paying Rs. 5,000 costs to the respondent's advocates in each appeal within four weeks; failure to pay would result in revival of the dismissal orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts