DHEERAJ MOR vs HONBLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI — C.A. No. 1698/2020
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010134092015
Filing Date
24-04-2015 12:17 PM
Registration No
C.A. No. 1698/2020
Diary Number
13409/2015
Order Date
19-02-2020
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2017 INSC 64, 2018 INSC 46, 2020 INSC 209
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHEERAJ MOR
Adv. R. C. KAUSHIK
Respondent(s)
HONBLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Adv. ANNAM D. N. RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ANNAM D. N. RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-01-2020 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 15-01-2020 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 14-01-2020 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 12-12-2019 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 10-12-2019 | Fixed Date by Court |
Orders in this case
Case Summary: Dheeraj Mor v. High Court of Delhi (C.A. No. 001698/2020) Outcome: The Supreme Court granted leave and overruled the prior *Vijay Kumar Mishra* decision. The Court held that judicial service members cannot compete for District Judge positions reserved for practicing advocates under Article 233 of the Constitution. Ineligible in-service candidates who were appointed must be reverted to their original posts. Key Directions: High Courts must consider promotion of affected judicial officers per existing rules if their promotion channel had ripened before the ineligible appointment. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts