DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 4(1)BAI vs M/S.MAY AND BAKER LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER — C.A. No. 263/2015

Case under Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [Other Than Matters Covered by Categories 1602-1605] Section III. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010133792012

Filing Date

17-Apr-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 263/2015

Diary Number

13379/2012

Order Date

18-Jun-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [other than matters covered by categories 1602-1605] Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 4(1)BAI

    Adv. SUDARSHAN LAMBA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S.MAY AND BAKER LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER

    Adv. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Palli

  2. 11-Feb-2026

    ROPView PDF

  3. 11-Feb-2026

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  4. 24-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Jan-2015

    ROPView PDF

  6. 08-Jan-2015

    ROPView PDF

  7. 31-Oct-2014

    ROPView PDF

  8. 19-Aug-2014

    ROPView PDF

  9. 29-Apr-2014

    ROPView PDF

  10. 13-Feb-2014

    ROPView PDF

  11. 22-Jan-2013

    ROPView PDF

  12. 24-Aug-2012

    ROPView PDF

  13. 17-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 263/2015

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 5059/2014

PDF 1PDF 2PDF 3PDF 4PDF 5PDF 6PDF 7PDF 8PDF 9PDF 10
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 263/2015 The Supreme Court heard the Revenue's challenge to the High Court's order quashing the Income Tax Department's jurisdiction to issue reassessment notice under Sections 147/148 to May and Baker Ltd. The Court ordered that this appeal be listed together with the related C.A. No. 5059/2014, directing that if the Revenue fails on merits in that case, the jurisdictional issue here need not be addressed; conversely, if the Revenue succeeds, the Court will then examine the assessing authority's jurisdiction to reopen the assessment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case