TARANJIT SINGH . vs KAPIL . — C.A. No. 2926/2012
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010133762008
Filing Date
06-May-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 2926/2012
Diary Number
13376/2008
Order Date
16-Mar-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TARANJIT SINGH .
Adv. JYOTI MENDIRATTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAPIL .
Adv. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT BALBIR SINGH GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
24-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
22-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
10-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2926/2012
Summary of C.A. No. 002926/2012 (Taranjit Singh v. Kapil) The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal after the Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh agreed to accommodate respondent Kapil by appointing him as a Driver in the Fire Wing. The Court set aside the High Court's earlier quashing order and directed the Corporation to issue Kapil's appointment within 7 days, with seniority and benefits effective from his joining date, but without seniority over already-appointed drivers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts