MADHO SINGH vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE SECRETARY — C.A. No. 20/2010

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010133361999

Filing Date

25-Aug-1999

Registration No

C.A. No. 20/2010

Diary Number

13336/1999

Order Date

11-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2017 INSC 600

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHO SINGH

    Adv. RAJINDER MATHUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE SECRETARY

    Adv. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Jul-2017

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 11-Jul-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  5. 13-Mar-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 08-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 25-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 04-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 24-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 24-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 04-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 31-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 30-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 27-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 15-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 10-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 12-Dec-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 25-Aug-1999

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 20/2010

  25. [ 2017 INSC 600 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Madho Singh v. State of Punjab Madho Singh appealed against not being considered for appointment as Agricultural Development Officer for a post reserved for Scheduled Caste category, while a senior General category candidate was appointed instead. The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal with liberty for the appellant to file a representation regarding his claim for notional promotion within one month; the State must consider this representation after providing hearing to the appellant and affected parties, and pass appropriate orders within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case