MADHO SINGH vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE SECRETARY — C.A. No. 20/2010
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010133361999
Filing Date
25-Aug-1999
Registration No
C.A. No. 20/2010
Diary Number
13336/1999
Order Date
11-Jul-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2017 INSC 600
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHO SINGH
Adv. RAJINDER MATHUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE SECRETARY
Adv. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2017
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
13-Mar-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-1999
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 20/2010
-
[ 2017 INSC 600 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: Madho Singh v. State of Punjab Madho Singh appealed against not being considered for appointment as Agricultural Development Officer for a post reserved for Scheduled Caste category, while a senior General category candidate was appointed instead. The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal with liberty for the appellant to file a representation regarding his claim for notional promotion within one month; the State must consider this representation after providing hearing to the appellant and affected parties, and pass appropriate orders within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts