A.P.S.R.T.C. vs BODASINGI NARASIMHULU . — C.A. No. 3368/2003
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010133312000
Filing Date
10-Aug-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 3368/2003
Diary Number
13331/2000
Order Date
07-Apr-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A.P.S.R.T.C.
Adv. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.BODASINGI NARASIMHULU .
Adv. C. K. SUCHARITA V. G. PRAGASAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
30-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Dec-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2000
ROPView PDF
-
10-Aug-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3368/2003
Case Summary: C.A. No. 003368/2003 The Supreme Court dismissed A.P.S.R.T.C.'s appeals challenging the High Court's land acquisition compensation order. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to deduce 1/4th of the land's market value (₹80,000/acre) as development charges for utility services and civic amenities, finding the deduction justified given the land's location in a highly developed, industrialized area near highways and courts. The enhanced compensation amount has already been deposited and paid to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts