STATE OF HARYANA . vs SHIV KUMAR — C.A. No. 10022/2010

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010133202007

Filing Date

03-May-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 10022/2010

Diary Number

13320/2007

Order Date

19-Nov-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA .

    Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIV KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 30-Sep-2010
  5. 10-Sep-2010
  6. 23-Jul-2010
  7. 19-Apr-2010
  8. 08-Apr-2010
  9. 29-Mar-2010
  10. 17-Mar-2010
  11. 25-Feb-2010
  12. 11-Jan-2010
  13. 07-Dec-2009
  14. 11-Nov-2009
  15. 19-Oct-2009
  16. 30-Sep-2009
  17. 24-Aug-2009
  18. 17-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 11-Feb-2009
  20. 28-Jul-2008
  21. 03-Jan-2008
  22. 23-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 30-Oct-2007
  24. 19-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 23-Jul-2007
  26. 18-Jul-2007
  27. 17-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 03-May-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 10022/2010

  29. 27-Apr-2007
  30. 19-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 02-Apr-2007
  32. 01-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 09-Feb-2007
  34. 19-Jan-2007
  35. 15-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 15-Jan-2007
  37. 27-Nov-2006
  38. 27-Nov-2006
  39. 27-Nov-2006
  40. 27-Nov-2006
  41. 21-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 14-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 31-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court heard Civil Appeal No. 10022/2010 (State of Haryana v. Shiv Kumar) on November 19, 2010, along with related appeals. The Court allowed the appeals by following its earlier judgment in State of Haryana v. Kashmir Singh (dated October 6, 2010), setting aside the High Court's impugned judgment and dismissing the writ petitions. The Court also dismissed three unrelated petitions for non-prosecution and de-tagged two other petitions for separate listing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case