STATE OF HARYANA . vs SHIV KUMAR — C.A. No. 10022/2010
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010133202007
Filing Date
03-May-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 10022/2010
Diary Number
13320/2007
Order Date
19-Nov-2010
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIV KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
17-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
25-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
11-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
07-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2009
ROPView PDF
-
19-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
30-Sep-2009
ROPView PDF
-
24-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
17-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
28-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
03-Jan-2008
ROPView PDF
-
23-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2007
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2007
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 10022/2010
-
27-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
01-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2007
ROPView PDF
-
15-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2007
ROPView PDF
-
27-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
27-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
27-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
27-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
21-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
The Supreme Court heard Civil Appeal No. 10022/2010 (State of Haryana v. Shiv Kumar) on November 19, 2010, along with related appeals. The Court allowed the appeals by following its earlier judgment in State of Haryana v. Kashmir Singh (dated October 6, 2010), setting aside the High Court's impugned judgment and dismissing the writ petitions. The Court also dismissed three unrelated petitions for non-prosecution and de-tagged two other petitions for separate listing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts