STATE OF HARYANA . vs SULTAN SINGH . — C.A. No. 10021/2010
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010133192007
Filing Date
03-May-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 10021/2010
Diary Number
13319/2007
Order Date
19-Nov-2010
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SULTAN SINGH .
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
17-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
25-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
11-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
07-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2009
ROPView PDF
-
19-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
30-Sep-2009
ROPView PDF
-
24-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
17-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
28-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
03-Jan-2008
ROPView PDF
-
23-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2007
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2007
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 10021/2010
-
27-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
01-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2007
ROPView PDF
-
15-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2007
ROPView PDF
-
27-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
27-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
27-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
27-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
21-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 010021/2010 The Supreme Court allowed the State of Haryana's appeal on November 19, 2010, following the precedent established in Civil Appeal Nos. 8690-8701 of 2010. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment and dismissed the underlying writ petitions. Three unrelated petitions were de-tagged for separate listing, while three other petitions were dismissed for non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts