SEBI vs PURSHOTTAM BUDHWANI — C.A. No. 4460/2015
Case under Sebi Act and Securities Laws Including Forward Contract Regulation Act, 1952 and Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 : Sebi Act and Securities Laws Including Forward Contract Regulation Act, 1952 and Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 Section XVII. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010132372015
Filing Date
22-Apr-2015
Registration No
C.A. No. 4460/2015
Diary Number
13237/2015
Order Date
04-Dec-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SEBI
Adv. K J JOHN AND CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.PURSHOTTAM BUDHWANI
Adv. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH
Case History
-
04-Dec-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Registrar (J) - IV
-
25-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Jul-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Apr-2015
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4460/2015
Summary: SEBI v. Purshottam Budhwani (C.A. No. 004460/2015) On 04-12-2017, the Registrar heard SEBI's appeal against Purshottam Budhwani and related matters. The court noted that counsel failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period but ruled that such filing is not mandatory under amended Supreme Court Rules, 2013. The matters were directed to be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts