SRI RAJIV SARIN vs STATE OF HARYANA . — C.A. No. 9869/2003
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010131322001
Filing Date
06-Aug-2001
Registration No
C.A. No. 9869/2003
Diary Number
13132/2001
Order Date
27-Oct-2004
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI RAJIV SARIN
Adv. B. K. PAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. KAVEETA WADIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Oct-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jul-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Dec-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2003
ROPView PDF
-
14-Apr-2003
ROPView PDF
-
07-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jan-2003
ROPView PDF
-
20-Dec-2002
ROPView PDF
-
15-Nov-2002
ROPView PDF
-
04-Oct-2002
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2002
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
19-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
05-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2002
ROPView PDF
-
22-Jul-2002
ROPView PDF
-
29-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2002
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2002
ROPView PDF
-
21-Jan-2002
ROPView PDF
-
07-Dec-2001
ROPView PDF
-
29-Oct-2001
ROPView PDF
-
08-Oct-2001
ROPView PDF
-
08-Oct-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2001
ROPView PDF
-
14-Sep-2001
ROPView PDF
-
14-Sep-2001
ROPView PDF
-
31-Aug-2001
ROPView PDF
-
31-Aug-2001
ROPView PDF
-
27-Aug-2001
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2001
ROPView PDF
-
06-Aug-2001
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 9869/2003
-
01-Jan-1970
ROPView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 009869/2003 (Sri Rajiv Sarin v. State of Haryana) The Supreme Court allowed multiple consolidated land acquisition appeals involving 486.61 acres in Faridabad acquired in 1992. The court remitted the matter to the reference court for fresh reassessment of compensation, directing it to reconsider certified sale deeds as evidence in light of the Constitution Bench's ruling on Section 51A admissibility, while maintaining the minimum market value floor of Rs.90/- per square yard previously set by the High Court. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts