SHIVAGOUDA R. PATIL (D) BY PROP. LRS. vs MALAGOUDA BHIMAGOUDA PATIL . — C.A. No. 5867 - 5868/2005

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010130622004

Filing Date

03-Jul-2004

Registration No

C.A. No. 5867 - 5868/2005

Diary Number

13062/2004

Order Date

18-Mar-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVAGOUDA R. PATIL (D) BY PROP. LRS.

    Adv. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALAGOUDA BHIMAGOUDA PATIL .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 24-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 24-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 16-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 03-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 14-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 19-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 01-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 29-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-Jul-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5867 - 5868/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 005867-005868/2005 The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal against a 1975 sale deed of 5 acres of land in Karnataka. The Court found that the lower courts' findings regarding "legal necessity" for the sale were unsustainable, as debts were incurred three years after the sale and totaled less than ₹1,000. Critically, the Court declared the sale valid only for the adoptive father's share, not the appellant's share, and modified the appellant's entitlement from one-sixth to one-fourth of the property. The Executing Court was directed to allot the one-fourth share to the appellant within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case