LAKSHMI SUGAR MILL,UTTARANCHAL vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH — C.A. No. 5955/2005

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010129412005

Filing Date

04-Jul-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 5955/2005

Diary Number

12941/2005

Order Date

30-Jan-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKSHMI SUGAR MILL,UTTARANCHAL

    Adv. VISHWAJIT SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

    Adv. ROHIT K. SINGH[R-1] NIRANJANA SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] SANJEEV ANAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Jan-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 30-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  4. 29-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  5. 29-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  6. 24-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  7. 23-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  8. 22-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  9. 17-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  10. 16-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 25-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 25-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 01-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 01-Apr-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  15. 01-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 05-Jan-2012
  17. 28-Nov-2011
  18. 05-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 29-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 28-Mar-2011
  21. 01-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 12-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 08-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 09-Aug-2010
  25. 07-Jul-2010
  26. 20-Apr-2010
  27. 19-Mar-2010
  28. 17-Feb-2010
  29. 23-Oct-2009
  30. 23-Sep-2005
  31. 21-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 05-Sep-2005
  33. 05-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 26-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 22-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 04-Jul-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5955/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Lakshmi Sugar Mill v. State of Uttar Pradesh Outcome: The Supreme Court held that State Governments have authority to reserve sugarcane-growing areas within their boundaries to supply factories located outside the State, under the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966. The Court dismissed the respondent's argument that UP's sugarcane legislation prevented such reservations, finding no statutory embargo against it. Ruling Details: The Court determined that while the Central Government holds reservation powers under Clause 6, Clause 11 validly delegates this authority to States (via 1966 notification). This arrangement accords with the constitutional scheme and does not render the Control Order redundant. All connected civil appeals were disposed of accordingly on January 30, 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case