M/S BALAJI MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC RES.CEN. vs SOCIAL JURIST,A LAWYERS GROUP . — SLP(C) No. 12835/2008
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010129402008
Filing Date
02-May-2008
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 12835/2008
Diary Number
12940/2008
Order Date
01-Sep-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S BALAJI MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC RES.CEN.
Respondent(s)
-
1.SOCIAL JURIST,A LAWYERS GROUP .
Adv. ASHWANI KUMAR DEVENDRA SINGH MEHRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
02-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
28-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
09-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
10-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
02-May-2008
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 12835/2008
-
21-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
07-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
04-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2008
ROPView PDF
-
14-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 12835/2008 M/s Balaji Medical & Diagnostic Research Centre v. Social Jurist On 01/09/2011, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition filed by Balaji Medical & Diagnostic Research Centre. The Court upheld that hospitals must provide free treatment to 25% of outpatient (OPD) and 10% of inpatient (IPD) patients without any charges, though hospitals may arrange cost funding through their own resources, sponsorships, endowments, or donations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts