BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CAL.PO vs PORT TENANTS WELFARE ASSN. — C.A. No. 4491/2010
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010129222007
Filing Date
01-May-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 4491/2010
Diary Number
12922/2007
Order Date
27-Jul-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2017 INSC 675
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CAL.PO
Adv. A. V. RANGAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.PORT TENANTS WELFARE ASSN.
Adv. SUSMITA LAL FOX MANDAL & CO. (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2017
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
19-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4491/2010
-
[ 2017 INSC 675 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: C.A. No. 004491/2010 The Supreme Court disposed of the Board of Trustees for the Port of Calcutta's appeal against the High Court's judgment on July 27, 2017. The High Court had allowed port tenants 36 installments to pay rent arrears with 6% annual interest. The Supreme Court set aside the interest rate provision, finding the High Court had not adjudicated on the proper interest rate (15-18% under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963). However, invoking Article 142 of the Constitution to end the long-standing dispute, the Court held that no further interest would be levied since tenants had already paid at the High Court-fixed rate, while clarifying this decision would not serve as precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts