MURUGAN vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — Crl.A. No. 229/2012

Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010128882011

Filing Date

19-Apr-2011

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 229/2012

Diary Number

12888/2011

Order Date

10-Oct-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Partly Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MURUGAN

    Adv. P. VINAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

    Adv. M. YOGESH KANNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Oct-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 10-Oct-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  4. 01-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 29-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 14-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 14-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 10-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 10-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 20-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 06-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 01-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 01-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 01-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 11-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 08-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 19-Apr-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 229/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Murugan v. The State of Tamil Nadu Outcome: Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, modifying Murugan's conviction from Section 302 IPC (murder) to Section 326 IPC (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon). His life sentence was reduced to time served, and he was ordered released immediately (October 10, 2018), as he had already spent over 8 years in custody. Reason: The prosecution failed to establish murder charges based on weak evidence—only one eyewitness (the deceased's wife) provided a solitary statement about a knife wound, while the deceased suffered 23 injuries. The prosecution could not correlate which specific injuries Murugan caused, making individual culpability for murder unsustainable under IPC Section 302. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case