BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. vs RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. . — C.A. No. 4287 - 4289/2012

Case under 4501_3Jj-telegraph & Telecom Laws : Three Judge Matter Section XVII. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010128312012

Filing Date

12-Apr-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 4287 - 4289/2012

Diary Number

12831/2012

Order Date

22-Nov-2023

Document Type

ROP

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

4501_3jj-Telegraph & Telecom Laws : Three Judge Matter Section XVII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.

    Adv. GAURAV SHARMA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] MOHIT PAUL[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. .

    Adv. NAVIN CHAWLA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] [Pr] PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-4] SHWETA SHARMA[R-2]

Case History

  1. 22-Nov-2023
  2. 22-Nov-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta

  3. 10-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 10-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Mar-2015
  8. 18-Mar-2015
  9. 17-Feb-2015
  10. 17-Feb-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  11. 17-Feb-2015
  12. 29-Jan-2015
  13. 29-Jan-2015
  14. 25-Nov-2014
  15. 25-Nov-2014
  16. 09-Oct-2014
  17. 09-Oct-2014
  18. 10-Sep-2014
  19. 10-Sep-2014
  20. 20-Aug-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  21. 01-Aug-2014
  22. 09-Jul-2014
  23. 08-May-2014
  24. 06-May-2014
  25. 08-Jan-2014
  26. 01-Oct-2013

    Office ReportView PDF

  27. 30-Jul-2013
  28. 01-Mar-2013
  29. 02-Jul-2012
  30. 12-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4287 - 4289/2012

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: R.P.(C) No. 1409 - 1410/2014

casestatus.in Summary

In this 22 November 2023 hearing, the Supreme Court acknowledged that respondent Reliance Communications Ltd. has entered insolvency proceedings under the IBC. The court directed BSNL to ensure the Resolution Professional is informed of case pendency and takes necessary steps for representation. The matter was adjourned to be listed together with related proceedings (R.P.(C)No.1409-1410/2014 in C.A.No.5253/2010) concerning validity of 2006 and 2009 Regulations, upon which the present case substantially depends. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case