KAILASH N. DWIVEDI vs STATE OF U.P. — C.A. No. 2885/2001
Case under Section Z_NOT KNOWN. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010127861999
Filing Date
17-Aug-1999
Registration No
C.A. No. 2885/2001
Diary Number
12786/1999
Order Date
29-Nov-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAILASH N. DWIVEDI
Adv. RACHNA GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P.
Adv. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Mar-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Nov-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-May-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-1999
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2885/2001
-
01-Jan-1970
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary: Kailash N. Dwivedi v. State of U.P. (C.A. No. 2885/2001) The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' appeals challenging the High Court's dismissal of their writ petitions seeking release of land acquired in 1959 under a development scheme. The Court held that the scheme continued under the 1959 Act and could not lapse; moreover, the appellants lost standing by accepting compensation and could not later seek release after 30+ years, especially since portions were transferred to the State Industrial Development Corporation and developed with allotted industrial plots. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts