SURESH KRIPLANI vs PIRAMO INVESTORS LTD. . — SLP(C) No. 19099 - 19100/2013

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010127062013

Filing Date

18-Apr-2013

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 19099 - 19100/2013

Diary Number

12706/2013

Order Date

23-Nov-2015

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH KRIPLANI

    Adv. VICTOR MOSES & ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PIRAMO INVESTORS LTD. .

    Adv. KHAITAN & CO. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 29-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 29-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 21-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 08-Aug-2013
  8. 12-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 18-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 19099 - 19100/2013

  10. 19-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 27-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 18-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 02-Jan-2012
  15. 24-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 24-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 12-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 08-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 22-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 09-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 13-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 02-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 26-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 07-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY On 23/11/2015, the Supreme Court heard petitioner Suresh Kriplani's SLP against a Calcutta High Court order. The Court modified its previous order dated 29/9/2015 and directed refund of Rs. 30,00,000 (thirty lacs) along with accrued interest to the petitioner. The office report for directions was ordered accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case