RAMESH DASU CHAUHAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1682/2012

Case under Section II-A. Status: Sclsc Disposed.

Sclsc Disposed

CNR: SCIN010125242012

Filing Date

11-Apr-2012

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1682/2012

Diary Number

12524/2012

Order Date

04-Jul-2019

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2019 INSC 722

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH DASU CHAUHAN

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR TALESARA[P-1] [SCLSC]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jul-2019

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Jul-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 04-Jul-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant

  5. 19-Jun-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 19-Jun-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant

  7. 18-Jun-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 18-Jun-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant

  9. 29-Apr-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 29-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 30-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 11-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1682/2012

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' conviction appeal, upholding their guilty verdict for murder (Section 302) and robbery (Section 392) with common intention in the 2001 death of 79-year-old Kamlesh Kumari Trivedi. The court found compelling circumstantial evidence establishing the appellants' presence at the crime scene at the relevant time based on credible eyewitness testimony, recovery of stolen items (TV, silver coin, cash) at their instance, and medical evidence of death by ligature strangulation, rejecting the appellants' denials as evasive and unsupported by any credible alternative explanation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case