INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4 AMBALA, HARYANA vs VIJAY GUPTA — SLP(C) No. 15907/2026

Case under Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [Other Than Matters Covered by Categories 1602-1605] Section IV-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010123472026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 15907/2026

Diary Number

12347/2026

Order Date

30-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending Ias)

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [other than matters covered by categories 1602-1605] Section IV-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4 AMBALA, HARYANA

    Adv. SUDARSHAN LAMBA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 15907/2026

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: SLP(C) No. 15883/2026

PDF 1
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary [SKIP] This hearing record contains three separate Supreme Court proceedings with hundreds of diary numbers and parties. The document is largely a list of advocates and parties appearing, with minimal substantive orders. For the first matter (Income Tax case), the Court disposed of petitions by reference to an earlier order in Civil Appeal No.4716/2026. For the second matter (Ravi Ramchandra Pardeshi vs State of Maharashtra), permission was granted to withdraw certain matters while others were granted 8 weeks to cure procedural defects. For the third matter (Venkatrao vs Deputy Commissioner), similar orders were passed. Given the repetitive and largely procedural nature of the entire document with no clear single outcome or case summary, a meaningful 2-3 sentence summary cannot be provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case