SHETKARI SANGHARSH SAMITI vs THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, KONKAN DIVISION — SLP(C) No. 16960/2013

Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010123302013

Filing Date

16-Apr-2013

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 16960/2013

Diary Number

12330/2013

Order Date

04-Dec-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHETKARI SANGHARSH SAMITI

    Adv. ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, KONKAN DIVISION

    Adv. SHIV KUMAR SURI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) HASAN MURTAZA[R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Dec-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Dec-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol

  4. 28-Nov-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol

  5. 02-Feb-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 02-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 14-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 14-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 15-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 15-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 31-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 31-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 25-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 29-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 28-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 03-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 05-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 16-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 16960/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 16960/2013 On 04-12-2023, the Supreme Court dismissed Shetkari Sangharsh Samiti's Special Leave Petition in default after the petitioner failed to appear despite receiving notice of alternative arrangement. The Court noted the petition originated from a 2013 High Court order and inferred the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case