BHARAT KR.LATHI vs VINOD AGRAWAL — C.A. No. 2846/2015

Case under Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Matters Arising Out of Suit for Specific Performance, Declaration, Injunction, Possession or Cancellation of Deeds/documents Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010122322012

Filing Date

09-Apr-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 2846/2015

Diary Number

12232/2012

Order Date

12-Nov-2024

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Appeals Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – matters arising out of suit for specific performance, declaration, injunction, possession or cancellation of deeds/documents Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT KR.LATHI

    Adv. MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) YADAV NARENDER SINGH[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINOD AGRAWAL

    Adv. DIVYAKANT LAHOTI[R-7] AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-5] AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-6.4] AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-6.3] AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-6.2] AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-6.1] YUGANDHARA PAWAR JHA[R-4] VANDANA SEHGAL[R-1] SHAKIL AHMED SYED (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Nov-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  3. 24-Jul-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  4. 15-May-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  5. 08-May-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  6. 02-May-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  7. 24-Apr-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  8. 18-Apr-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  9. 20-Mar-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  10. 06-Mar-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  11. 29-Feb-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  12. 28-Feb-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  13. 02-Jan-2023

    Ordinary

    Registrar

  14. 03-Nov-2022

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  15. 13-Jul-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J-IV)

  16. 19-Apr-2022

    Ordinary

    Registrar (J-IV)

  17. 10-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 24-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 24-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 08-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 14-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 07-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 09-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 23-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 20-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 03-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 03-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 17-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 07-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 19-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 18-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 06-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 30-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 09-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2846/2015

  35. [ 2024 INSC 865 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 2845/2015

PDF 1PDF 2PDF 3PDF 4PDF 5PDF 6PDF 7PDF 8PDF 9PDF 10PDF 11PDF 12PDF 13PDF 14PDF 15PDF 16PDF 17PDF 18
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C.A. No. 2846/2015 - Bharat Kr. Lathi v. Vinod Agrawal Court Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court's judgment dismissing the suits, and restored the Trial Court's decree for specific performance of the Agreement to Sell dated 30.08.1990. Key Facts: Six purchasers executed agreements to sell with Sushila Devi in 1990, paid full consideration, and received possession of 23.98 acres in Bhopal. After Sushila Devi's death in 1992, her legal heirs refused to execute sale deeds, instead applying for mutation. Despite an interim injunction, the heirs sold the property to third parties in 2001. The appellants filed suits for specific performance in 1995. Core Reasoning: The Supreme Court found: (1) the Agreement to Sell was validly executed and proved through credible witness testimony and original title deeds; (2) the defendants failed to substantiate their fraud allegations; (3) the suit was within limitation (cause of action arose upon refusal by heirs after Sushila Devi's death); (4) violation of interim injunction undermined defendants' credibility; and (5) subsequent purchasers obtained only their vendors' rights, which were extinguished by the valid prior agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case