CONTROLLER OF EXAM.,T.N.P.S.COMMISSION vs R.G., HIGH COURT OF MADRAS . — SLP(C) No. 7882/2007

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010122092007

Filing Date

24-Apr-2007

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 7882/2007

Diary Number

12209/2007

Order Date

21-Apr-2008

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CONTROLLER OF EXAM.,T.N.P.S.COMMISSION

    Adv. T. HARISH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.G., HIGH COURT OF MADRAS .

    Adv. V. G. PRAGASAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ANIL K. JHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 04-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 24-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 24-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 30-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 18-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 26-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Apr-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 7882/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 7882/2007 Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of the petition by approving a settlement between the High Court of Madras and Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission for recruiting 201 Civil Judge (Junior Division) posts in 2008. The agreed procedure includes: High Court setting question papers with answer keys; Senior District Judges evaluating answers; five High Court judges conducting viva-voce over two weeks; and notification of vacancies within three weeks with complete selection within six months. Next Steps: The notification inviting applications for 201 vacancies will be issued within three weeks, and the entire selection process must be completed within six months thereof. This solution applies only to the present recruitment, pending the Supreme Court's final decision on future selection procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case