GIAN KAUR & ORS. ETC. vs THE AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST . — C.A. No. 5589 - 5592/2012

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010121512012

Filing Date

09-Apr-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 5589 - 5592/2012

Diary Number

12151/2012

Order Date

31-Jul-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GIAN KAUR & ORS. ETC.

    Adv. SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Jul-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 29-Apr-2014
  5. 04-Apr-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Apr-2014
  7. 04-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 31-Mar-2014
  9. 28-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 14-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 02-Dec-2013
  13. 23-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 14-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 02-Aug-2013
  16. 29-Jul-2013
  17. 01-Jul-2013
  18. 01-May-2013
  19. 22-Apr-2013
  20. 08-Apr-2013
  21. 22-Mar-2013
  22. 15-Feb-2013
  23. 16-Jan-2013
  24. 02-Jan-2013
  25. 11-Dec-2012
  26. 04-Dec-2012
  27. 19-Nov-2012
  28. 05-Nov-2012
  29. 15-Oct-2012
  30. 12-Oct-2012
  31. 01-Oct-2012
  32. 10-Sep-2012
  33. 10-Sep-2012
  34. 23-Jul-2012
  35. 17-Jul-2012
  36. 09-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5589 - 5592/2012

  37. 16-Sep-2011
  38. 29-Aug-2011
  39. 29-Jul-2011
  40. 10-May-2011
  41. 14-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 5589-5592/2012 - Gian Kaur v. Amritsar Improvement Trust The Supreme Court dismissed the consolidated appeals challenging the High Court's land valuation determination in an Amritsar Improvement Trust land acquisition case. The Court upheld the High Court's market value assessment of Rs. 18.50 per square yard, rejecting appellants' argument for Rs. 40 per square yard based on maximum sale instances. The Court clarified that the precedent cited (Anjani Molu Dessai) does not mandate using highest exemplar prices; averaging comparable sale deeds is appropriate, particularly when subject land (323 acres) vastly exceeds exemplar sizes, and applying 25% deduction was reasonable and fair. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case