GIAN KAUR & ORS. ETC. vs THE AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST . — C.A. No. 5589 - 5592/2012
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010121512012
Filing Date
09-Apr-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 5589 - 5592/2012
Diary Number
12151/2012
Order Date
31-Jul-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GIAN KAUR & ORS. ETC.
Adv. SUBHASISH BHOWMICK
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST .
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2014
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2014
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2014
ROPView PDF
-
28-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2013
ROPView PDF
-
23-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
01-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
01-May-2013
ROPView PDF
-
22-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
08-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
22-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
15-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
11-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
19-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
05-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
15-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
12-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
01-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
10-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
10-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5589 - 5592/2012
-
16-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
10-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: C.A. No. 5589-5592/2012 - Gian Kaur v. Amritsar Improvement Trust The Supreme Court dismissed the consolidated appeals challenging the High Court's land valuation determination in an Amritsar Improvement Trust land acquisition case. The Court upheld the High Court's market value assessment of Rs. 18.50 per square yard, rejecting appellants' argument for Rs. 40 per square yard based on maximum sale instances. The Court clarified that the precedent cited (Anjani Molu Dessai) does not mandate using highest exemplar prices; averaging comparable sale deeds is appropriate, particularly when subject land (323 acres) vastly exceeds exemplar sizes, and applying 25% deduction was reasonable and fair. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts