HAJI ASIF A. SATAR PANWALA . vs SHARIFBHAI HASAMBHAI SAKARAYANI — C.A. No. 3880/2013
Case under Contempt of Court : Civil Contempt Including Suo Moto Contempt Petition, Appeals/slps Arising Out of Civil Contempt Petitions Before the High Court Section III-B. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010121142013
Filing Date
15-Apr-2013
Registration No
C.A. No. 3880/2013
Diary Number
12114/2013
Order Date
02-Jul-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HAJI ASIF A. SATAR PANWALA .
Adv. LAWYER S KNIT & CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHARIFBHAI HASAMBHAI SAKARAYANI
Adv. HEMANTIKA WAHI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH
Case History
-
02-Jul-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
02-May-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2019
Ordinary
Registrar (J) - II
-
01-Apr-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J-VI)
-
06-Feb-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
06-Dec-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2017
ROPView PDF
-
23-Feb-2017
Office ReportView PDF
-
23-Feb-2017
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
24-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
24-Sep-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
24-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
01-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
01-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
13-May-2015
ROPView PDF
-
13-May-2015
ROPView PDF
-
10-Mar-2015
ROPView PDF
-
10-Mar-2015
ROPView PDF
-
17-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
12-Nov-2014
ROPView PDF
-
25-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
25-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
19-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
19-Sep-2014
Office ReportView PDF
-
19-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
18-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
18-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
29-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2013
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3880/2013
Case Summary: C.A. No. 003880/2013 On 2 July 2019, the Registrar Court heard Civil Appeal No. 3880/2013 between Haji Asif A. Satar Panwala (Appellant) and Sharifbhai Hasambhai Sakarayani (Respondent). The Court noted that Respondents 1-3 filed counter-affidavits, Respondent 4 was served but did not appear, and Respondent 5 was duly represented. The Registry was directed to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts